Why quotas are the wrong answer

first_img whatsapp Tags: NULL whatsapp Sunday 13 February 2011 11:47 pm by Taboolaby TaboolaSponsored LinksSponsored LinksPromoted LinksPromoted LinksYou May LikeMisterStoryWoman Files For Divorce After Seeing This Photo – Can You See Why?MisterStoryPeople TodayNewborn’s Strange Behavior Troubles Mom, 40 Years Later She Finds The Reason Behind ItPeople TodayMoneyPailShe Was A Star, Now She Works In ScottsdaleMoneyPailTotal PastThe Ingenious Reason There Are No Mosquitoes At Disney WorldTotal PastSerendipity TimesInside Coco Chanel’s Eerily Abandoned Mansion Frozen In TimeSerendipity TimesBrake For ItThe Most Worthless Cars Ever MadeBrake For ItBetterBe20 Stunning Female AthletesBetterBeZen HeraldNASA’s Voyager 2 Has Entered Deep Space – And It Brought Scientists To Their KneesZen Heraldautooverload.comDeclassified Vietnam War Photos The Public Wasn’t Meant To Seeautooverload.com Sharecenter_img QUOTAS are wrong. In a free, liberal society, people should never be given jobs just because they happen to be part of a particular group. Applicants should be judged solely on their merits – for their ability to perform and their motivation – and not on whether they tick an arbitrary box. There should be no discrimination against or in favour of any group and no favouritism. Those who want strict rules on the proportion of women on quoted company boards are rightly seeking to improve women’s chances and to help them realise their dreams – but their methods will fail. Quotas are tantamount to placing a sticking plaster on an infected wound, and assuming that all is now well. Quotas devalue the achievements of those who climb to the top without any artificial assistance, punish those who are discriminated against, inevitably promote inferior candidates (and hurt firms) and create resentment. They replace one flawed network by another: instead of the old school tie, whereby a small group of male cronies serve on vast numbers of boards, an even smaller number of women would end up doing the same, in an even more extreme manner. The figures would look better, but there would be no real transfer of power.Other solutions are needed. For a start, there is a desperate need to better understand the real reasons why there aren’t more women in top jobs and what can be done to sweep away barriers to a truly meritocratic Britain. Clearly, the old-fashioned, in-your-face, despicably sexist discrimination of yore is in dramatic retreat – but that has not been enough. Intriguingly, there has been an explosion of foreign-born male CEOs – the UK boardroom, at least at the top, is no longer a closed shop dominated by a self-perpetuating elite. But this hasn’t translated into a shift of the gender balance: the share of female FTSE 100 directors seems stuck at 12.5 per cent and just 7.8 per cent for the FTSE 250, as Cranfield University’s annual FTSE Board Report points out. In 2009, of the 14 new women hired as FTSE 100 directors for the first time, only one was British. Of the five female FTSE 100 CEOs in 2011, just two are British, three American (and if Santander UK floats, the sixth would be Spanish). UK born-women are falling behind even their foreign-born counterparts, let alone men. It is not just boardrooms that are male-dominated – this is a much more general issue. Take the Cabinet: out of 23 members, four are women (including a minister without portfolio); another six (male) ministers also attend meetings. So 17.4 per cent of members are women, falling to 13.8 per cent of ministers in attendance. All the powerful positions are held by men, with only minor departments (and non-departments) in the hands of women. The media is no different: out of eleven national daily paid-for papers, ten national Sundays, three free daily commuter papers and the three top-circulating current affairs/political weekly magazines, just two (7.4 per cent) are edited by women. There is hope. Eighty-two FTSE 100 companies have women on their executive committees. Many of these will eventually graduate to main board directorships. There is also a growing pipeline – 2,551 women on the corporate boards and executive committees of all FTSE listed companies, not counting the women on FTSE 100 corporate boards. Change is coming. I wish I knew how to speed it up – but quotas are clearly not the way forward. [email protected] me on Twitter: @allisterheath Show Comments ▼ KCS-content More From Our Partners A ProPublica investigation has caused outrage in the U.S. this weekvaluewalk.comMark Eaton, former NBA All-Star, dead at 64nypost.comAstounding Fossil Discovery in California After Man Looks Closelygoodnewsnetwork.org980-foot skyscraper sways in China, prompting panic and evacuationsnypost.comNative American Tribe Gets Back Sacred Island Taken 160 Years Agogoodnewsnetwork.orgRussell Wilson, AOC among many voicing support for Naomi Osakacbsnews.comBrave 7-Year-old Boy Swims an Hour to Rescue His Dad and Little Sistergoodnewsnetwork.orgInside Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis’ not-so-average farmhouse estatenypost.comPolice Capture Elusive Tiger Poacher After 20 Years of Pursuing the Huntergoodnewsnetwork.orgKiller drone ‘hunted down a human target’ without being told tonypost.comMatt Gaetz swindled by ‘malicious actors’ in $155K boat sale boondogglenypost.comSupermodel Anne Vyalitsyna claims income drop, pushes for child supportnypost.comConnecticut man dies after crashing Harley into live bearnypost.comI blew off Adam Sandler 22 years ago — and it’s my biggest regretnypost.comFlorida woman allegedly crashes children’s birthday party, rapes teennypost.comBiden received funds from top Russia lobbyist before Nord Stream 2 giveawaynypost.comSidney Crosby, Alex Ovechkin are graying and frayingnypost.comUK teen died on school trip after teachers allegedly refused her pleasnypost.com Why quotas are the wrong answer last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *